The Cold Truth About Respiratory Infections

Yesterday, we asked about your climate-themed policy for avoiding respiratory infections. Some respondents believe in getting cold, fresh air, while others think staying warm is important. What does the science say?
Discover the truth about how temperature affects colds, flu, and other respiratory infections.

The Pathogens That Came In From The Cold

Yesterday, we asked you about your climate-themed policy for avoiding respiratory infections, and got the above-depicted, below-described, set of answers:

  • About 46% of respondents said “Temperature has no bearing on infection risk”
  • About 31% of respondents said “It’s important to get plenty of cold, fresh air, as this kills/inactivates pathogens”
  • About 22% of respondents said “It’s important to stay warm to avoid getting colds, flu, etc”

Some gave rationales, including…

For “stay warm”:

❝Childhood lessons❞

For “get cold, fresh air”:

❝I just feel that it’s healthy to get fresh air daily. Whether it kills germs, I don’t know❞

For “temperature has no bearing”:

❝If climate issue affected respiratory infections, would people in the tropics suffer more than those in colder climates? Pollutants may affect respiratory infections, but I doubt just temperature would do so.❞

So, what does the science say?

It’s important to stay warm to avoid getting colds, flu, etc: True or False?

False, simply. Cold weather does increase the infection risk, but for reasons that a hat and scarf won’t protect you from. More on this later, but for now, let’s lay to rest the idea that bodily chilling will promote infection by cold, flu, etc.

In a small-ish but statistically significant study (n=180), it was found that…

❝There was no evidence that chilling caused any acute change in symptom scores❞

Read more: Acute cooling of the feet and the onset of common cold symptoms

Note: they do mention in their conclusion that chilling the feet “causes the onset of cold symptoms in about 10% of subjects who are chilled”, but the data does not support that conclusion, and the only clear indicator is that people who are more prone to colds generally, were more prone to getting a cold after a cold water footbath.

In other words, people who were more prone to colds remained more prone to colds, just the same.

It’s important to get plenty of cold, fresh air, as this kills/inactivates pathogens: True or False?

Broadly False, though most pathogens do have an optimal operating temperature that (for obvious reasons) is around normal human body temperature.

However, given that they don’t generally have to survive outside of a host body for long to get passed on, the fact that the pathogens may be a little sluggish in the great outdoors will not change the fact that they will be delighted by the climate in your respiratory tract as soon as you get back into the warm.

With regard to the cold air not being a reliable killer/inactivator of pathogens, we call to the witness stand…

Polar Bear Dies From Bird Flu As H5N1 Spreads Across Globe

(it was found near Utqiagvik, one of the northernmost communities in Alaska)

Because pathogens like human body temperature, raising the body temperature is a way to kill/inactivate them: True or False?

True! Unfortunately, it’s also a way to kill us. Because we, too, cannot survive for long above our normal body temperature.

So, for example, bundling up warmly and cranking up the heating won’t necessarily help, because:

  • if the temperature is comfortable for you, it’s comfortable for the pathogen
  • if the temperature is dangerous to the pathogen, it’s dangerous to you too

This is why the fever response evolved, and/but why many people with fevers die anyway. It’s the body’s way of playing chicken with the pathogen, challenging “guess which of us can survive this for longer!”

Temperature has no bearing on infection risk: True or False?

True and/or False, circumstantially. This one’s a little complex, but let’s break it down to the essentials.

  • Temperature has no direct effect, for the reasons we outlined above
  • Temperature is often related to humidity, which does have an effect
  • Temperature does tend to influence human behavior (more time spent in open spaces with good ventilation vs more time spent in closed quarters with poor ventilation and/or recycled air), which has an obvious effect on transmission rates

The first one we covered, and the third one is self-evident, so let’s look at the second one:

Temperature is often related to humidity, which does have an effect

When the environmental temperature is warmer, water droplets in the air will tend to be bigger, and thus drop to the ground much more quickly.

When the environmental temperature is colder, water droplets in the air will tend to be smaller, and thus stay in the air for longer (along with any pathogens those water droplets may be carrying).

Some papers on the impact of this:

So whatever temperature you like to keep your environment, humidity is a protective factor against respiratory infections, and dry air is a risk factor.

So, for example:

  • If the weather doesn’t suit having good ventilation, a humidifier is a good option
  • Being in an airplane is one of the worst places to be for this, outside of a hospital

Don’t have a humidifier? Here’s an example product on Amazon, but by all means shop around.

A crock pot with hot water in and the lid off is also a very workable workaround too 😉

Take care!

Share This Post

  • Is laziness a myth? Dr. Price dissects the true roots of “laziness” and offers practical solutions for overcoming exhaustion in work, projects, and personal relationships.

Learn To Grow

Sign up for weekly gardening tips, product reviews and discounts.

  • Stop Cancer 20 Years Ago

    Dr. Jenn Simmons shares vital tips on preventing cancer and inflammation, advocating for lifestyle changes and proactive health management at any age.

    Get Abreast And Keep Abreast

    This is Dr. Jenn Simmons. Her specialization is integrative oncology, as she—then a breast cancer surgeon—got breast cancer, decided the system wasn’t nearly as good from the patients’ side of things as from the doctors’ side, and took to educate herself, and now others, on how things can be better.

    What does she want us to know?

    Start now

    If you have breast cancer, the best time to start adjusting your lifestyle might be 20 years ago, but the second-best time is now. We realize our readers with breast cancer (or a history thereof) probably have indeed started already—all strength to you.

    What this means for those of us without breast cancer (or a history therof) is: start now

    Even if you don’t have a genetic risk factor, even if there’s no history of it in your family, there’s just no reason not to start now.

    Start what, you ask? Taking away its roots. And how?

    Inflammation as the root of cancer

    To oversimplify: cancer occurs because an accidentally immortal cell replicates and replicates and replicates and takes any nearby resources to keep on going. While science doesn’t know all the details of how this happens, it is a factor of genetic mutation (itself a normal process, without which evolution would be impossible), something which in turn is accelerated by damage to the DNA. The damage to the DNA? That occurs (often as not) as a result of cellular oxidation. Cellular oxidation is far from the only genotoxic thing out there, and a lot of non-food “this thing causes cancer” warnings are usually about other kinds of genotoxicity. But cellular oxidation is a big one, and it’s one that we can fight vigorously with our lifestyle.

    Because cellular oxidation and inflammation go hand-in-hand, reducing one tends to reduce the other. That’s why so often you’ll see in our Research Review Monday features, a line that goes something like:

    “and now for those things that usually come together: antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, and anti-aging”

    So, fight inflammation now, and have a reduced risk of a lot of other woes later.

    See: How to Prevent (or Reduce) Inflammation

    Don’t settle for “normal”

    People are told, correctly but not always helpfully, such things as:

    • It’s normal to have less energy at your age
    • It’s normal to have a weaker immune system at your age
    • It’s normal to be at a higher risk of diabetes, heart disease, etc

    …and many more. And these things are true! But that doesn’t mean we have to settle for them.

    We can be all the way over on the healthy end of the distribution curve. We can do that!

    (so can everyone else, given sufficient opportunity and resources, because health is not a zero-sum game)

    If we’re going to get a cancer diagnosis, then our 60s are the decade where we’re most likely to get it. Earlier than that and the risk is extant but lower; later than that and technically the risk increases, but we probably got it already in our 60s.

    So, if we be younger than 60, then now’s a good time to prepare to hit the ground running when we get there. And if we missed that chance, then again, the second-best time is now:

    See: Focusing On Health In Our Sixties

    Fast to live

    Of course, anything can happen to anyone at any age (alas), but this is about the benefits of living a fasting lifestyle—that is to say, not just fasting for a 4-week health kick or something, but making it one’s “new normal” and just continuing it for life.

    This doesn’t mean “never eat”, of course, but it does mean “practice intermittent fasting, if you can”—something that Dr. Simmons strongly advocates.

    See: Intermittent Fasting: We Sort The Science From The Hype

    While this calls back to the previous “fight inflammation”, it deserves its own mention here as a very specific way of fighting it.

    It’s never too late

    All of the advices that go before a cancer diagnosis, continue to stand afterwards too. There is no point of “well, I already have cancer, so what’s the harm in…?”

    The harm in it after a diagnosis will be the same as the harm before. When it comes to lifestyle, preventing a cancer and preventing it from spreading are very much the same thing, which is also the same as shrinking it. Basically, if it’s anticancer, it’s anticancer, no matter whether it’s before, during, or after.

    Dr. Simmons has seen too many patients get a diagnosis, and place their lives squarely in the hands of doctors, when doctors can only do so much.

    Instead, Dr. Simmons recommends taking charge of your health as best you are able, today and onwards, no matter what. And that means two things:

    1. Knowing stuff
    2. Doing stuff

    So it becomes our responsibility (and our lifeline) to educate ourselves, and take action accordingly.

    Want to know more?

    We recently reviewed her book, and heartily recommend it:

    The Smart Woman’s Guide to Breast Cancer – by Dr. Jenn Simmons

    Enjoy!